<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s that f-stop stuff anyway?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stopshootingauto.com/2007/09/14/whats-that-f-stop-stuff-anyway/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stopshootingauto.com/2007/09/14/whats-that-f-stop-stuff-anyway/</link>
	<description>You're smarter than your camera</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 05:55:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: stopshootingauto</title>
		<link>http://stopshootingauto.com/2007/09/14/whats-that-f-stop-stuff-anyway/#comment-456</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stopshootingauto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 21:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopshootingauto.com/2007/09/14/whats-that-f-stop-stuff-anyway/#comment-456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A great question, Steven.  

+.07 didn&#039;t make sense to me, so I walked across the street to a bookstore and took a look.  It&#039;s actually +.7, which makes a bit more sense.  I&#039;m not 100% certain of this answer, but it&#039;s my best guess.

Back in the days of film, it was not uncommon to &quot;push process&quot; film, which basically means increasing the exposure when it&#039;s developed.  Though it&#039;s not exactly the same, the Photoshop equivalent would be to take the exposure slider and move it to the right.

I believe that in this context, +.7 means that he increased the exposure by .7 stop in post-processing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great question, Steven.  </p>
<p>+.07 didn&#8217;t make sense to me, so I walked across the street to a bookstore and took a look.  It&#8217;s actually +.7, which makes a bit more sense.  I&#8217;m not 100% certain of this answer, but it&#8217;s my best guess.</p>
<p>Back in the days of film, it was not uncommon to &#8220;push process&#8221; film, which basically means increasing the exposure when it&#8217;s developed.  Though it&#8217;s not exactly the same, the Photoshop equivalent would be to take the exposure slider and move it to the right.</p>
<p>I believe that in this context, +.7 means that he increased the exposure by .7 stop in post-processing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://stopshootingauto.com/2007/09/14/whats-that-f-stop-stuff-anyway/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 18:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopshootingauto.com/2007/09/14/whats-that-f-stop-stuff-anyway/#comment-455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was reading the Nature Photography mag. and one of the pages (as all of them seems to) shows the image, and next to the images it tells you what type of camera was used, the lense and other info about the seetings used. The photographer also said that he used +.07 stop exposure.  Is he/she saying that they added a +.07 f/stop, aperture, to the exposure, or does this have to do with some other setting, and how do you get just a .0 anything setting?

The issue is Winter 2008/2009 page 26.

Thanks,

Steven]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was reading the Nature Photography mag. and one of the pages (as all of them seems to) shows the image, and next to the images it tells you what type of camera was used, the lense and other info about the seetings used. The photographer also said that he used +.07 stop exposure.  Is he/she saying that they added a +.07 f/stop, aperture, to the exposure, or does this have to do with some other setting, and how do you get just a .0 anything setting?</p>
<p>The issue is Winter 2008/2009 page 26.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Steven</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stopshootingauto</title>
		<link>http://stopshootingauto.com/2007/09/14/whats-that-f-stop-stuff-anyway/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stopshootingauto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 21:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopshootingauto.com/2007/09/14/whats-that-f-stop-stuff-anyway/#comment-5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good question!

They actually mean something.  In short, it&#039;s the ratio of the focal length of the lens to the size of the opening.  There&#039;s a really good discussion of this in &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aperture&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the Wikipedia entry on Aperture&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question!</p>
<p>They actually mean something.  In short, it&#8217;s the ratio of the focal length of the lens to the size of the opening.  There&#8217;s a really good discussion of this in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aperture" rel="nofollow">the Wikipedia entry on Aperture</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KL</title>
		<link>http://stopshootingauto.com/2007/09/14/whats-that-f-stop-stuff-anyway/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopshootingauto.com/2007/09/14/whats-that-f-stop-stuff-anyway/#comment-4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Other than getting bigger and smaller, do the f-stop numbers actually mean anything specific?  Is f/8 just wider than f/11, or is there some mathematical magic?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other than getting bigger and smaller, do the f-stop numbers actually mean anything specific?  Is f/8 just wider than f/11, or is there some mathematical magic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

