<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evolution of photographic maturity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stopshootingauto.com/2009/07/26/evolution-of-photographic-maturity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stopshootingauto.com/2009/07/26/evolution-of-photographic-maturity/</link>
	<description>You're smarter than your camera</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 04:32:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timprov</title>
		<link>http://stopshootingauto.com/2009/07/26/evolution-of-photographic-maturity/#comment-753</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Timprov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 03:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopshootingauto.com/?p=186#comment-753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I strongly prefer primes, so this is a significant issue for me.

Most outdoor places I go I take a backpack with all my gear, three bottles of water, and two dry pairs of socks.  Usually I carry a tripod as well.  I really don&#039;t see much benefit in not carrying two or three lenses I don&#039;t use in that configuration; compared to the water, they&#039;re pretty light.  Sometimes I don&#039;t use the tripod, but I end up needing it as a balance aid often enough that it&#039;s worth carrying even when I doubt I&#039;ll use it photographically.  Plus I figure any extra weight is extra calories burned.

When I go somewhere I can dump the backpack, I take it with me, since there&#039;s no reason not to.  The tripod lives in the trunk of my car if I&#039;m not carrying it somewhere, so it&#039;s usually available.

If I&#039;m going somewhere with a specific purpose, I tend not to carry a bag at all.  Either I&#039;ll glue one lens to the camera and use it all day, or I&#039;ll put the pouch that came with the 135L on my belt, and bring one medium-sized lens plus one or both of the Nifty Fifty and Zuiko 24mm f/2.8, which are pocketable.  I love the Zuiko in particular for the convenience of its size.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I strongly prefer primes, so this is a significant issue for me.</p>
<p>Most outdoor places I go I take a backpack with all my gear, three bottles of water, and two dry pairs of socks.  Usually I carry a tripod as well.  I really don&#8217;t see much benefit in not carrying two or three lenses I don&#8217;t use in that configuration; compared to the water, they&#8217;re pretty light.  Sometimes I don&#8217;t use the tripod, but I end up needing it as a balance aid often enough that it&#8217;s worth carrying even when I doubt I&#8217;ll use it photographically.  Plus I figure any extra weight is extra calories burned.</p>
<p>When I go somewhere I can dump the backpack, I take it with me, since there&#8217;s no reason not to.  The tripod lives in the trunk of my car if I&#8217;m not carrying it somewhere, so it&#8217;s usually available.</p>
<p>If I&#8217;m going somewhere with a specific purpose, I tend not to carry a bag at all.  Either I&#8217;ll glue one lens to the camera and use it all day, or I&#8217;ll put the pouch that came with the 135L on my belt, and bring one medium-sized lens plus one or both of the Nifty Fifty and Zuiko 24mm f/2.8, which are pocketable.  I love the Zuiko in particular for the convenience of its size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

